Tue, 30 Dec 1997 06:41:12 -0700
- Message No. 1835
From: "Bernd Schmidt-Hartlieb"
Subject: Re: Fuel for AT
Nicola Moretto wrote:
>Hi @ friends !!
>
>I'm agree with you when you say that the best fuel for @ is unleaded 98
>oct. fuel.
Why? My dealer told me (as described in the manual too) to use unleaded 95 oct. fuel.
Off course my @ is going faster with unleaded 98 oct. :-)), but it is more expensive
:-((
>But in some place (for example in my poor Italy) Eurosuper 98 (unleaded)
>is not available.... :-((((
>We can choose between Super 98 oct. (more or less leaded, depends of the
>company) or Green Fuel (95 oct.)
So use the green stuff as I do except you want more power for more money...
>I use super easy-leaded fuel because @ is not catalized and using green
>fuel in combination with not-catalized engine we doing more pollution
>than using only leaded fuel !!!
Is that true? In Germany leaded fuel is not available anymore!
>At least I know that... but if someone is more expert than me he's
>invicted to do his suggestion about this important (for me and I hope
>for all) question.
>
>I hope that next new bikes like Honda XRV 1000 will be equipped with
>catalizator (almost like optional like actual BMW and few others) so
>also in Italy bikers can uses green fuel (much better for pollution and
>for new engines)
That's another good question: Does anybody have experience with third-party catalizators
which are availabe at HG, Polo, ...??? For off-road-trips in Africa they are not
usefull because of the fuel-problem but within the "civilized" central Europe? Does
they have any impact on the engine? Or is it recommandable to implement them? The
manufacturer promise less pollution without impacts on sound and PS...
Thanks and all the best for 1998!
Bernd
Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere!
http://www.mailexcite.com

dipper@normans.isd.uni-stuttgart.de